Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2009-02-05 kell 04:05, kirjutas Peter Stuge:
Tom Sylla wrote:
- { 0x51400008, MSRTYPE_RDWR, MSR2(0, 0), "DIVIL_LBAR_IRQ", "Local BAR
- IRQ Mapper", {
{ 63, 15, RESERVED },
{ 48, 1, RESERVED },
I'm sure there is some reason, but why isn't this just "{ 63, 16, RESERVED }," ?
It does not matter to msrtool at the moment. I made it two separate fields primarily because they are separate in the data book. In the future maybe msrtool will also be writing to MSRs, in which case it becomes more important because the latter is always write 0, but again there's no way to express that in msrtool right now. Maybe fields for that should be added sooner rather than later?
{ 47, 4, "IO_MASK", "I/O Address Mask Value", PRESENT_BIN, {
The masks are probably most readable as hex, especially to match the display type of the BAR.
Could certainly change that. I like them different because they have a different length than the base address, and I find binary easier than hex for masks. A habit I guess.
- { 0x51400009, MSRTYPE_RDWR, MSR2(0, 0), "DIVIL_LBAR_KEL", "Local BAR
- KEL from USB OHC Host Controller", {
Copied directly from the spec, but just "Local BAR - KEL from USB OHC" wouldn't propagate RAS Syndrome.
Thank you!
- { 0x51400020, MSRTYPE_RDWR, MSR2(0, 0), "PIC_YSEL_LOW", "IRQ Mapper
Unrestricted Y Select Low", {
{ 63, 32, RESERVED },
{ 31, 4, "MAP_Y7", "Map Unrestricted Y Input 7", PRESENT_BIN, {
HEX is maybe more readable for all of these selects?
I used binary because the bitdefs are listed that way in the data book. All selects have full bitdef text descriptions and they have the number in decimal, so I think it should be ok.
{ 0, 1, "IG8_STS_PRIM", "Primary Input 8", PRESENT_BIN, {
{ MSR1(0), "No interrupt." },
{ MSR1(1), "Interrupt status." },
Like Myles said, "Interrupt set" or maybe "Interrupt requested" for value '1'
I like set over requested, but status over set. Maybe signal active or simply condition or signalled?
I was surprised to see this patch not included yet in some form. Do you need more review to an updated patch or just this poke? :)
Regards, Mart Raudsepp