"Ronald G. Minnich" rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
They can. But I am about to suggest simply removing the config directive, and assuming the ``config chip.h'' is always given. The overhead is almost zero for a zero filled structure. And always requiring a chip.h would tend to simply the process of writing code for a new chip.
yes, I think Eric is right on this one too :-)
I think we probably want to wait a little on this one. YhLu is extremely tight on space right now and I think that needs to be addressed before we require any more slight size increases.
Eric