----- Original Message ----
From: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
-----Original Message----- From: ron minnich [mailto:rminnich@gmail.com]
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Myles Watson wrote:
.....
Marc made the case that things such as superio should not even be "under" the lpc in the dts, since they stand "outside" the tree in some sense. He argued that we should instead put them at top level. There is merit to his argument. This would simplify the lpc code as well.
I think it's fine to have the lpc define resources since that's who implements them, but I like the idea of the resource being visible from the domain (maybe not outside the tree.)
I think you either have a separate legacy/subtractive/isa/lpc domain or it needs to be under the isa/lpc pci device. What I didn't really like was that it was uncontained in the domain. It was just sitting at the top level pci bus. BUT that is just a nit. Documented correctly etc I could live with it.
Marc