On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:57:00AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
i think some parts here could be done easyer with outb.
This implementation of the MX25L4005 relies heavily on the chip being attached to an IT8716F SuperIO. I think we should create an abstraction layer (spi_command()? read_spi_status()?) that can be implemented by a SuperIO or southbridge that has an SPI bus attached.
Yes.
//Peter