On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Probing for Fintek Super I/O at 0x2e... failed Probing for Fintek Super I/O at 0x4e... failed Probing 0x2e, failed (0x22), data returns 0x04 Probing 0x2e, failed (0x22), data returns 0x04 Probing for ITE Super I/O (init=0x87,0x01,0x55,0x55/0xaa) at 0x4e... failed Probing for ITE Super I/O (init=0x87,0x87) at 0x4e... failed Probing 0x2e, failed (0x21), data returns 0x00 Probing 0x2e, failed (0x0e), data returns 0x00 Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x4e... failed Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x4e... failed Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x3f0... failed Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x3f0... failed Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x370... failed Probing for SMSC Super I/O at 0x370... failed
However, the probing sequence is incomplete (at least when judging it by its output) and Uwe rewrote the probing sequence, so he can take a look at it.
Will do. What do you mean with incomplete? The --verbose output needs some more fixing to make it more informative, IMO.
ITE superio probing at 0x2e does not appear in the log above.
Ah, yes, indeed. I think it _was_ being probed but not correctly shown in the output. I guess the two 'Probing 0x2e, failed...' lines belong to the ITE 0x2e probing.
Anyway, the output should be much better in the latest revision. Can you please repost the --verbose output?
Uwe.