Re: [coreboot] [PATCH]More consistent behaviour for printk_*

[Stefan Reinauer]

On 27.04.2009 21:32 Uhr, Corey Osgood wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ron minnich <[e-mail]
> > wrote:
> I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.
>
>
> If we're going to keep spending time making v2 more v3-like (printk,
> CBFS, Kconfig, etc), then why even bother with v3? v3 seems like it's
> got some really great advantages, but noone seems to care about
> finishing it.

I think its time that we take what we have learned and bring v2 further
in an evolutionary way.