-----Original Message----- From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Marc Jones Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 3:28 PM To: Coreboot Subject: Re: [coreboot] Resource allocation
----- Original Message ----
From: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com To: Coreboot coreboot@coreboot.org Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 2:53:57 PM Subject: [coreboot] Resource allocation
I need to clear up my understanding of resource allocation. Here's my understanding of it:
- Start at the root with 2 resources (1 for memory, 1 for IO)
- For each child of each link: A. Add resources B. Get common constraints C. Descend links D. Propagate back to root
When you're done you should have the Root device with the superset of
all
devices' resources.
Yes, and each bridge needs the resources grouped which is why the links(bridges) are desended as found.
My question is if resources ever split. In other words, lets imagine a device which implements several IO ports in the 0x3fX range and larger regions that must be mapped above 0x1000. Since the limit for the
smaller
regions is 0x7ff and the alignment for the larger regions is 0x1000,
they
both can't coexist.
What happens?
Everything below 0x1000 is legacy IO space and are not typically used by PCI devices (some devices/firmware sneek some stuff in around 0x800 for ACPI). As you noted there are some devices that might need to decode legacy regions to boot. If that is the case they will usually have a legacy enable bit in the header. In legacy mode the PCI BARs are ignored. The firmware, option ROM, and driver need to be aware of which mode it is in. An example is the AMD sb600 IDE controller(Device 20, Function 1). There is a legacy/PCI mode in the revision register ot offset 0x8.
Thanks Marc.
All right. So the legacy IO resources shouldn't be grouped with the others. Should they be marked Subtractive? Are they declared to be special in a different way?
Thanks, Myles