Am 23.04.2009 01:58, schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
On 23.04.2009 01:51, Stephan Raue wrote:
Am 23.04.2009 01:27, schrieb svn@coreboot.org:
Author: hailfinger Date: 2009-04-23 01:27:25 +0200 (Thu, 23 Apr 2009) New Revision: 4191
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/config/Options.lb Log: Sometimes when we debug the code, we need to know which version we are working on. Add the svn revision to the coreboot version string.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Baozheng.bao@amd.com Acked-by: Myles Watsonmylesgw@gmail.com Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfingerc-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/config/Options.lb
--- trunk/coreboot-v2/src/config/Options.lb 2009-04-22 23:17:44 UTC (rev 4190) +++ trunk/coreboot-v2/src/config/Options.lb 2009-04-22 23:27:25 UTC (rev 4191) @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ comment "Objcopy command" end define COREBOOT_VERSION
- default "2.0.0"
- default "2.0.0-r$(shell if [ -f `which svnversion` ]; then
svnversion $(TOP); fi)"
how i can handle this, when i am provide a source-package downloaded with a very recent svn-program and packaged this to *tar.bz2.
Does the tarball really contain a .svn directory?
yes the tarball contain a .svn directory and i can change or remove this calls - i dont know if its a problem for flashrom when the svnversion is incorrect on compiling time.