3 Mar
2015
3 Mar
'15
6:33 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:06 AM Paul Menzel < paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2015, 00:06 -0600 schrieb Alexandru Gagniuc:
In the past Ron also disagreed on changing headers by Samsung – taken from U-Boot I think – saying their lawyers drafted those and therefore it should stay that way.
That's right, you don't get to change other people's headers, especially when the headers are created by company lawyers. They get picky that way.
Maybe a vote like in *Unifying IO accessor macros* [2] should be done.
That's not how license headers work. You don't vote to change things that a company requires in code it releases. That's too bad, but that's how it is.
ron