Peter Stuge wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:43:02PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Personally, I'm not convinced we want to do tarball releases at all, not sure it's worth the hassle. Definately not "real" releases as in flashrom 0.4.5 or so,
These are very good for distributions. Not all distributions can deal with svn HEAD and few do it well IMO.
What would be the problem with a version "r3065"? I doubt any distributions would have a problem with that.
but maybe one tarball per svn revision would be nice to put up on the website similar to the svn snapshots which are generated for coreboot? Stefan?
Would definately be a good thing!
These can be generated using viewvc. I don't want to create another binary graveyard for millions of 0s and 1s ;-)
I am even thinking of getting rid of the tarballs, replacing them by viewvc links. The reason I did not is that viewvc does not honor the +x bit of files in the repo, so the tree migh
For the longer term I'd like a config file for flashrom that is all that ever really changes unless a new bus comes along.
ie. describing all the flash chips? I agree.