8 Sep
2008
8 Sep
'08
5:42 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
That means we either
- have to tell gcc that the stack moved in the middle of a function or
- redesign v3 stage1 completely.
That sucks. Very much.
it's not that hard. You split stage1 in half. I had an implementation of this at one point until we decided to return from disable_car().
My opinion, then and now, is that NOT returning from disable_car is a more general solution, which future-proofs us against a stupid future CPU that could not return from disable_car(). There, I've said it.
ron