Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] libgcc regparm workaround

[Stefan Reinauer]

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > I'm worried about any libgcc compiled with regparm!=0, but for now this
> > patch improves the situation.
>
> libgcc uses the default calling convention.

Is there an attribute to say "this function uses the default calling
convention no matter what CFLAGS we have right now"?