2010/10/2 Stefan Reinauer stefan.reinauer@coresystems.de
On 10/1/10 11:27 PM, Uwe Hermann wrote:
See patch.
abuilt-tested.
Uwe.
IMHO the patch makes it really hard to actually see what the code does. I think Idwer was recently running into a problem where the use of post_code would trash %eax were hard to comprehend. Now we seem have a lot more code that comes from somewhere else and touches registers without it being obvious to the reader of the code.
Uwe pointed me to this errata: http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/specupdate/253176.pdf
Is processor init (with or without CAR but preferably with) still possible ?
The CPU that's used on the board is either a "N = Intel ® Pentium ® 4 processor" or a "R = Intel ® Pentium ® 4 processor on 90 nm process", cpuid is 0xf29.
Just my 2ct.
Stefan
Idwer
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot