On 6/30/07, Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:27:27PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On 6/30/07, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:43:20PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
So instead of adding enabled; to all device nodes, we should add disabled to those that we do not want enabled. What do you think?
We should definately optimize for the common case whatever it is.
What I can do is look for a disable property in each node. If it is NOT found, emit .enabled = 1; If it is found, .enabled = 0;
sound ok?
Why not, instead of 'enabled;', use enabled="0" or enabled="1" then? That has the benefit that you don't have to know what the default is (enabled or disabled), you know everything you need just by looking at the dts itself.
Uwe.
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGhvBIXdVoV3jWIbQRAgQoAJ0dDBxSH2BlcI7u0ldL93XOtM57/gCbB7nD 120zDwDQEbqpwuyLjU8xfAE= =hPcG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios