On 04.04.2009 01:08, ron minnich wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
Patrick Georgi wrote:
romtool per-build
Is it too much for us to ask that the cbfs tool is built and installed into the build system? I think that would be ok.
that's a reasonable idea.
Just tell people that the tool needs to be executable and in PATH
Please don't. That will make incompatible changes for romtool impossible. Just think of the child^Wpain we had with multiple lzma implementations. v3 avoids the lzma problem by building lzma in the build dir so we always know the lzma version.
Regards, Carl-Daniel