On 2/11/10 1:55 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Patrick Georgi wrote:
Can't we also get rid of the various explicit dependencies on build.h with that?
I'd love to get rid of it completely.. Will look into that.
I checked in a partly improvement now... I would generally be nice to have "real" dependencies (i.e. something generated by gcc -MD) Not sure how feasible this would be, but it would solve our trouble once and for good.
Stefan