On 10.12.2008 23:02, Myles Watson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
You're welcome. I admit that off-by-one errors are pretty hard to spot and your code really looked correct at the first glance. We have an old saying at my university about such bugs: "Programmers are either off by one or by a factor of two." It happened to me often enough. ;-)
On 10.12.2008 22:51, Corey Osgood wrote:
Per Segher's email I'd prefer to go with Carl-Daniel's original suggestion of using 0x100000000.
Sounds good.
Even though the Kconfig solution proposed was ugly, could we think of a different one that would still live in Kconfig. It seems a lot nicer to catch it during configuration than during the build.
I hope to move CAR settings away from Kconfig. It was needed to store these settings in Kconfig when we had no processor-specific include files, but that's no longer the case. I'll send a patch.
Regards, Carl-Daniel