* Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de [070704 18:14]:
Yes, I fully agree. But we know the license, it's the GPLv2 for all Linux code except where noted otherwise (also mentioned in HACKING).
We do, but do we implicitly expect this from anyone else?
I think the "taken from Linux" mini-header should be enough, but we can also make it clearer if you want:
This is probably a good compromise. We list the license explicitly, and (only) the authors of the modifications.
I think either the current method, or method 1 or 3 are fine.
I think 3 is the best one.. We are already going safe in so many places (licenses for dts files and Kconfig files), so we should maybe just do the same here.
Other opinions?