Your well within your rights not to. I don't believe anyone should be compelled to expend effort for which they are not compensated.
But would anyone else like to explain why this isn't a GPL violation? Because it really seems like it is.
On 12/11/21 8:44 pm, Patrick Georgi wrote:
- November 2021 10:31, "Keith Emery" k.emery.nbn@internode.on.net schrieb:
I'm fairly sure it say's 'you must publish the source code AND any changes'. Did that change at some point?
I'm fairly sure that you don't understand the conditions under which the GPL takes effect. Since I'm not your lawyer, I won't discuss this with you any further.