Re: [coreboot] option rom size problem

[Leandro Dorileo]

Hi Stefan

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> On 20.07.2009 17:40 Uhr, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >    Since i am working with adding libpayload usb stack to option rom,
> > i have been blocked with the usb_initialize function. I find that the
> > size of libpayload is 104K, but the max size of option rom is oxff *
> > 512bytes. which means 127.5K.
> > I am afraid our option rom can not works fine with usb stack properly.
> > Is there any other method for us to expand the rom size?
>
> I think only those parts of libpayload that are actually used are
> getting linked into the final binary,  since the objects are packed into
> an "ar" archive. Do you exceed the rom size with libpayload and your
> code already, or is this rather a theoretical issue?

No, not theoretical we have reached the max limit, even with a minimal
configuration.
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff  114826 Jul 20 17:50 libpayload.a
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1192 Jul 20 17:50 colors.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1624 Jul 20 17:50 console.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1940 Jul 20 17:50 coreboot.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1720 Jul 20 17:50 ctype.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     514 Jul 20 17:50 exec.S.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     692 Jul 20 17:50 exec.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    5928 Jul 20 17:50 getopt_long.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     896 Jul 20 17:50 head.S.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     703 Jul 20 17:50 ipchecksum.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1384 Jul 20 17:50 keyboard.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    4592 Jul 20 17:50 lar.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1328 Jul 20 17:50 lib.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     920 Jul 20 17:50 main.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    3224 Jul 20 17:50 malloc.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1076 Jul 20 17:50 memory.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1432 Jul 20 17:50 nvram.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1608 Jul 20 17:50 options.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    2160 Jul 20 17:50 pci.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    6660 Jul 20 17:50 printf.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     816 Jul 20 17:50 rand.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1756 Jul 20 17:50 readline.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    9016 Jul 20 17:50 sha1.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1032 Jul 20 17:50 speaker.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    2648 Jul 20 17:50 string.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     712 Jul 20 17:50 sysinfo.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1808 Jul 20 17:50 time.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1448 Jul 20 17:50 timer.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff   10224 Jul 20 17:50 tinycurses.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff   11436 Jul 20 17:50 uhci.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    2384 Jul 20 17:50 uhci_rh.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    5560 Jul 20 17:50 usb.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     884 Jul 20 17:50 usb_dev.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    1576 Jul 20 17:50 usbinit.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    5704 Jul 20 17:50 usbmsc.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     524 Jul 20 17:50 util.S.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    2032 Jul 20 17:50 vga.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff    2848 Jul 20 17:50 video.o
> -rw-r--r--   1 stepan  staff     582 Jul 20 17:50 virtual.o
>
> I would think there is some potential for optimization: lar, tinycurses,
> vga, sha1, getopt_long, speaker, video, and probably some more stuff
> could be removed?

Removing most of libpayload we can take something around 100k, I think
it`s not enough.

Regards...