RE: GCC 3.2 ABI changes

[Ronald G Minnich]

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Steve M. Gehlbach wrote:
> gcc 2.96 is not a real release, more of a redhat branch off the 3.0 dev tree
> that gnu disavows.  There are notes somewhere about this but I couldn't
> quickly find the link.  I would consider anything that 2.96 does or does not
> do, to be a laboratory curiosity.  Can you compile a linux kernel with
> either 2.96 or 3.2?

I understand. But linuxbios has worked fine for several years on several
platforms with several gcc versions. Something bad has happened in 3.2
which we'll have to figure out.

ron