On 02.12.2007 00:34, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:11:36AM +0100, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
Hi,
building a LAB-image with buildrom (I had to do this on an other 32-bit machine) flashing now works for me, too. I tried to find out why, but so far without success. Some configuration might differ?
Hey,
I found the difference in the builds:
=================================================================== --- src/mainboard/gigabyte/m57sli/Config.lb (revision 2994) +++ src/mainboard/gigabyte/m57sli/Config.lb (working copy) @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ # SIO pin set 1 input mode #irq 0xc8 = 0x0 # SIO pin set 2 mixed input/output mode
irq 0xc9 = 0x40
irq 0xc9 = 0x0 # SIO pin set 4 input mode #irq 0xcb = 0x0 # Generate SMI# on EC IRQThis has been changed in rev 2972. Buildrom has still the 'old' version. Flashing works fine for me if irq 0xc9 = 0x0 is set. With irq 0xc9 = 0x40 it fails.
OK, is that a difference between board revisions, BIOS revisions or just a misinterpretation of some superiotool dump?
I can see that your latest superiotool dump with the proprietary BIOS has irq 0xc9 = 0x40 set. I tried to mirror that. Now the interesting question is: Why does that setting not work for you?
Could somebody check if flashing really works for some m57sli-boards (LPC) with the latest revision (irq 0xc9 = 0x40)?
To track this down, I need: * superiotool dump of proprietary BIOS for board revisions 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 2.x * the exact BIOS version of the proprietary BIOS.
It seems that Ward's board also has 0xc9 = 0x40 set.
Regards, Carl-Daniel