-p0? Is that seriously the standard here? Can I ask why?
Purely convenience of the patch reviewers / people doing the check-ins.
I'm sure you mean you want -p1 patches, instead?
Are -p0 and -p1 equivalent if the patch has a relative filename as opposed to an absolute? This is only academia anyway.
No, they are never equivalent; -p1 strips everything up to and including the first slash from every pathname, -p0 doesn't. You *always* need to use one of -p0 and -p1 fwiw.
Please send patches generated from the root of the svn tree; the LinuxBIOSv2 or v3 subdirectory.
Sounds advice. For some reason "svn diff" seems to generate -p0 style patches; every sane tool in the world uses -p1. Oh who cares, either style is trivial to deal with.
Segher