coreboot March 2024

coreboot@coreboot.org

19 participants
34 discussions

Gitiles broken?
by Julius Werner 19 Mar '24

19 Mar '24

Hi, It seems that coreboot's Gitiles has broken somehow? When I click the little SHA next to "Patchset X" on a commit, I'm just getting redirected to that commit again. When I go to BROWSE > Repositories > coreboot > Branches and click "main", nothing happens. When I directly go to https://review.coreboot.org/plugins/gitiles/coreboot, it says "Not Found".

3 2

coreboot Meetings Announcement And Agenda Call
by mina＠coreboot.org 19 Mar '24

19 Mar '24

Dear community, Please note that the upcoming coreboot leadership meeting is tomorrow, March 20, 2024.[1] You are welcome to review and update the current agenda items with matters you wish to see addressed during the meeting.[2] ## Current Agenda ### [Martin] Adding Max Brune and Jon Murphy as core developers. * | Name | Patches | Reviews | Comments|First Patch| |------------------|---------|---------|---------|-----------| | Maximilian Brune | 67 | 88 | 43 | 2022-05-16| | | | | | | | Jon Murphy | 115 | 130 | 29 | 2022-02-24| * Others who could be considered, but we’d like to see more community involvement, reviews, and/or comments from before considering them. * Frans Hendriks * Bora Guvendik * Keith Hui * Maulik Vaghela * Naresh Solanki * Tyler Wang * Varshit B Pandya * Kapil Porwal * If anyone feels that I’m mistaken about people in either group, please reach out to me or the leadership about these people. ### [Martin] RFC: Link Time Optimization ### [Martin] Bugs ### [Martin] Coverity issues * Current open issues spreadsheet [coreboot coverity issues](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/170ZaS8sRz8qh1lFm_088LzoBaL1…. * [chart of issues by area] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRYUlOLQTysbdPQoOKaCnRN_K4C… 6gATqtvgDlzSl1S4DaijcTyF7yAAs3qm/pubchart?oid=502535263&format=interactive). * [chart of issues by type] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRYUlOLQTysbdPQoOKaCnRN_K4C… 6gATqtvgDlzSl1S4DaijcTyF7yAAs3qm/pubchart?oid=1369215095&format=interactive). * Link to the coreboot project coverity:(https://scan.coverity.com/projects/coreboot) ## Announcements * FOSSY conference: August 1-4 2024 in Portland, Oregon, USA * https://sfconservancy.org/fossy/ [1](https://coreboot.org/calendar.html). [2](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRXqXcLBp5pFkHiJbrLdv3Spqh1Hu086HYkK….

1 0

coreboot Meetings Announcement And Agenda Call
by mina＠coreboot.org 18 Mar '24

18 Mar '24

Dear community, Kindly note that the upcoming coreboot leadership meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 20, 2024.[1] Please take a moment to update the current agenda items with matters you wish to see addressed during the meeting. [2] [1](https://www.coreboot.org/calendar.html). [2](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRXqXcLBp5pFkHiJbrLdv3Spqh1Hu086HYkK….

1 0

[coreboot - Bug #121] T520: Hangs in OS
by Anastasios Koutian 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Issue #121 has been updated by Anastasios Koutian. Anastasios Koutian wrote in #note-86: > Martin Zwicknagl wrote in #note-46: > > Hello, > > > > I can report, that I had NO freezes for a month now. > > > > During a RAM upgrade to 16GB I have replaced one 2GB Samsung SODIMM (2GB 1Rx8 PC3-10600s-09-10-ZZZ, M471B5773CHS-CH9 1149) > > with a SODIMM [Crucial CT102464BF160B 8GB Speicher (DDR3L, 1600 MT/s, PC3L-12800, SODIMM, 204-Pin)]. > > The laptop is now using two identical Crucial SODIMMs. > > > > The problem is gone. I do not need any ``intel_idle.max_cstate`` tricks anymore. My T520 is using all cores, hyperthreading, all cstates (and turbo boost). > > > > I think ticket 178 is also solved. Who can close 178? > > > > Cheeers > > Martin > > Hello all, > > I installed the exact same SODIMMs (Crucial CT102464BF160B) as the message quoted above and achieved four days continuous uptime with no issues. > I eventually had to reboot due to a necessary update, so it might be a premature conclusion. I will keep the system running for as long as I can to confirm. > > I haven't gotten around to comparing with MSRs on stock firmware yet, but will once I have spare time. After testing for two weeks, it became clear that the problem is still present, but with different symptoms: the system freezes for a short time and then reboots. Previously, it would freeze indefinitely. ---------------------------------------- Bug #121: T520: Hangs in OS https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/121#change-1794 * Author: Firstname Lastname * Status: In Progress * Priority: Normal * Category: chipset configuration * Start date: 2017-06-09 * Affected hardware: SNB, IVY * Affected OS: - ---------------------------------------- I have been running coreboot since 2017.04.15 and have experienced hangs ever since then. It was suggested by folk on the IRC that I run memtest to check for incorrect raminit causing errors, however I have run memtest for 12 hours straight with no errors. Due to the ambiguous nature of the hangs (immediate freeze with no warning signs, audio gets stuck repeating the last 50ms or so of noise, not sure what this effect is called) I don't have much useful information other than the .config and dmesg. However one thing I can say with high confidence is that the hangs occur significantly more frequently in Linux (*buntu distros) than Windows 10. Within an hour of launching Linux a hang is likely, whereas Windows typically runs for many hours before a hang occurs. I considered this an insignificant anecdotal anomaly at first but over the course of the nearly 2 months I have been running coreboot it seems to be a solid trend. The hangs occur anywhere, typically during mere desktop usage or basic web browsing. Additionally there is another form of hang I experience where the screen goes black except for some sort of graphical corruption down the left side (http://i.imgur.com/4zWrlpX.jpg), whether this is related to the more common total freeze hangs I don't know but I figured I should include it nonetheless. These hangs only occur about 1:20 compared to the regular hangs. ---Files-------------------------------- config (20.7 KB) dmesg.txt (57.3 KB) cbmem-raminit.txt (62 KB) lspci.txt (29.6 KB) cpuinfo.txt (3.94 KB) defconfig (1023 Bytes) defconfig (699 Bytes) -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: https://ticket.coreboot.org/my/account

1 0

[coreboot - Bug #327] MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR
by Joel Linn 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Issue #327 has been updated by Joel Linn. Works, setting 0x400 also boots the Win11 PE environment that BSODs with 0x2000 ---------------------------------------- Bug #327: MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/327#change-1793 * Author: xinhua wang * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Start date: 2021-12-30 ---------------------------------------- https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/27711/7/src/drivers/intel/gma/acpi… this line .. OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) the 0x2000 will cause BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR when booting installer, os, etc When set to 0x1000 windows UEFI tianocore mode boots fine ---Files-------------------------------- dmesg.txt (76.9 KB) results.log (204 KB) -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: https://ticket.coreboot.org/my/account

1 0

v24.02.01: error creating smc biosinfo
by Christoph Zechner 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Hi, while building coreboot for a LGA1151 board, we encountered the following error: TOOL Creating SMC BIOSINFO metadata E: Unsupported coreboot minor version E: Error creating 'build/mainboard/supermicro/x11-lga1151-series/smcbiosinfo.bin' make: *** [util/supermicro/Makefile.mk:22: build/mainboard/supermicro/x11-lga1151-series/smcbiosinfo.bin] Error 1 content of build/build.h: ... #define COREBOOT_ORIGIN_GIT_REVISION "Unknown" #define COREBOOT_EXTRA_VERSION "" #define COREBOOT_MAJOR_VERSION 24 #define COREBOOT_MINOR_VERSION 202 ... content of.coreboot-version: 24.02.01-0a280ff747 Find a patch attached that fixes parsing the minor version in genbuild_h.sh. Best regards Christoph Zechner

2 2

[coreboot - Bug #327] MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR
by Patrick Rudolph 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Issue #327 has been updated by Patrick Rudolph. Please test https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81295 In case this doesn't fix the problem please attach to windows kernel using windbg and provide more details about the failing code. ---------------------------------------- Bug #327: MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/327#change-1792 * Author: xinhua wang * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Start date: 2021-12-30 ---------------------------------------- https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/27711/7/src/drivers/intel/gma/acpi… this line .. OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) the 0x2000 will cause BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR when booting installer, os, etc When set to 0x1000 windows UEFI tianocore mode boots fine ---Files-------------------------------- dmesg.txt (76.9 KB) results.log (204 KB) -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: https://ticket.coreboot.org/my/account

1 0

[coreboot - Bug #327] MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR
by Patrick Rudolph 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Issue #327 has been updated by Patrick Rudolph. It looks like 0x2000 is the correct size for the total opregion (MBOX1-MBOX5). Since ACPI only uses MBOX3, the size should be reduced to 0x400. ---------------------------------------- Bug #327: MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/327#change-1791 * Author: xinhua wang * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Start date: 2021-12-30 ---------------------------------------- https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/27711/7/src/drivers/intel/gma/acpi… this line .. OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) the 0x2000 will cause BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR when booting installer, os, etc When set to 0x1000 windows UEFI tianocore mode boots fine ---Files-------------------------------- dmesg.txt (76.9 KB) results.log (204 KB) -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: https://ticket.coreboot.org/my/account

1 0

[coreboot - Bug #327] MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR
by Joel Linn 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Issue #327 has been updated by Joel Linn. I can also confirm this, I get *ACPI_BIOS_ERROR 0x1000 0x0 0x0 0x2000* and applying the mentioned change does the trick for me. Sandy Bridge H61 Express i3-3220, no secondary GPU, libgfxinit ---------------------------------------- Bug #327: MBOX3, OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) causes windows uefi tianocore BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/327#change-1790 * Author: xinhua wang * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Start date: 2021-12-30 ---------------------------------------- https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/27711/7/src/drivers/intel/gma/acpi… this line .. OperationRegion (OPRG, SystemMemory, ASLS, 0x2000) the 0x2000 will cause BSOD ACPI_BIOS_ERROR when booting installer, os, etc When set to 0x1000 windows UEFI tianocore mode boots fine ---Files-------------------------------- dmesg.txt (76.9 KB) results.log (204 KB) -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: https://ticket.coreboot.org/my/account

1 0

The coreboot master branch has been deleted
by Martin Roth 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Hello All, It's been mentioned a few times previously that we were going to delete the master branch after switching the default branch to 'main'. This process is now completed - the master branch is gone. One positive of this is that people can no longer push patches to the master branch in confusion, however anyone who hasn't updated scripts or git pointers in the past 6 months is now going to see failures. This could absolutely include the coreboot project as well. We've recently found settings that were still pointing at the master branch. If you see any oddness or issues that could be related to the master branch, please let the admins or leadership know. Thanks much. Martin

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

coreboot March 2024