[PATCH] update from revision guide for fam 0fh

[Rudolf Marek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

New revision guide September 2009 3.46
Lets add some more CPUs.

I also checked the Errata which we dont handle:

89, 169, 254,  292, (238 no resume?)

284, 325 (no resume?), 342 requires mcode.

Btw where to get the microcode for the fam 0fh?

here seems to be just for fam10h

http://www.amd64.org/support/microcode.html

Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek

(compile tested)

Rudolf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrFFKIACgkQ3J9wPJqZRNW9LwCg1taQkDbtK3VBDZLiuC9IQYDn
bDMAn3xNWMUCVyPWMY0kMSh/x0DTUyqS
=iMCR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Peter Stuge]

Rudolf Marek wrote:
> Lets add some more CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek

Acked-by: Peter Stuge

[Rudolf Marek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Please can someone have a look?

Rudolf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrRCcQACgkQ3J9wPJqZRNWaHgCffbCG9Zbzi3yQ06ryLv1KxGIR
IQAAoK+HrzG3JETD4NeQUadG22lShoLC
=OlIO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Myles Watson]

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Rudolf Marek  wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Please can someone have a look?

Did you see that Peter Acked it on October 1st?

Thanks,
Myles

[Rudolf Marek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nope ;) But I found it. Thanks

Rudolf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkriJuwACgkQ3J9wPJqZRNUWHgCgz5kDKvZrsGpR4wQ8lVB+P96o
OToAoI0Nqg8wqwOQUYc1C1zQsvW7Z90F
=LyXu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----