On 31/03/2017, Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> wrote:
On 31.03.2017 23:38, Sam Kuper wrote:
On 31/03/2017, David Hendricks
<david.hendricks(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Sam Kuper
<sam.kuper(a)uclmail.net>
wrote:
Also, to further address Patrick's point
above about marketing
material: it is important that the provenance of information about
Coreboot can be established. This is a reputational matter. That means
it is important that people should not legally be able to misrepresent
Coreboot contributors' views, etc,
Both CC-BY and CC-BY-SA have "no endorsement" clauses
Yes, but because CC BY imposes no restrictions on *second*-derivative
works,
[...]
I'm not convinced. Relicensing adapted
work under different conditions would require the explicit permission
by the copyright holder.
No, it wouldn't. That's what makes CC BY different from CC BY-SA.
(And I think you mean "licensing" rather than "relicensing", assuming
we are both talking about the first time that the *adapted work* is
licensed to the public.)
And I can't find that permission in CC BY.
See, especially, §1(a), §1(c), §1(h), §3(b), §3(d), and §4(b):
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
Regards.