Re: [coreboot] Future coreboot phases?

[Patrick Georgi]

Am 11.01.2010 13:41, schrieb [e-mail]:
> > great idea, we need it. I think it ought to be a .tex file. But this
> > is a good start, needs to be in svn
>
> yes and a wiki page please??

One or the other please, otherwise we have two out-of-sync documents.
And .tex? why not markdown or something like that?

Patrick

Future coreboot phases?

[Peter Stuge]

Patrick Georgi wrote:
> > > great idea, we need it. I think it ought to be a .tex file. But
> > > this is a good start, needs to be in svn
> >
> > yes and a wiki page please??
>
> One or the other please, otherwise we have two out-of-sync documents.
> And .tex? why not markdown or something like that?

I don't think svn or wiki matters. .tex is nice because you can
easily make .pdf and print. Ron has inspired me to use Lyx. :)
MediaWiki can also generate .pdf.

I think it's more important to save it than to have the right<tm>
format. I think a wiki page would be fine.

//Peter

Future coreboot phases?

[Patrick Georgi]

Am 11.01.2010 14:42, schrieb Peter Stuge:
> I don't think svn or wiki matters. .tex is nice because you can
> easily make .pdf and print. Ron has inspired me to use Lyx. :)

markdown can be transformed to tex for those that want it (and thus to
pdf), but it's still editable with a simple text editor (unlike lyx
files, or tex files of reasonable complexity). Lyx for windows is
basically non-existant, for example.
> I think it's more important to save it than to have the right<tm>
> format. I think a wiki page would be fine.

Right, and as said, one or the other please.
So wiki it is?

Patrick

Future coreboot phases?

On January 11, 2010 at 1:52 PM Patrick Georgi  wrote:
> Am 11.01.2010 14:42, schrieb Peter Stuge:
> > I don't think svn or wiki matters. .tex is nice because you can
> > easily make .pdf and print. Ron has inspired me to use Lyx. :)
>
> markdown can be transformed to tex for those that want it (and thus to
> pdf), but it's still editable with a simple text editor (unlike lyx
> files, or tex files of reasonable complexity). Lyx for windows is
> basically non-existant, for example.
> > I think it's more important to save it than to have the right<tm>
> > format. I think a wiki page would be fine.
>
> Right, and as said, one or the other please.
> So wiki it is?

My vote is for wiki...

Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org