Re: [LinuxBIOS] r538 - in LinuxBIOSv3: lib util/lar

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 05.12.2007 00:15, [e-mail] wrote:
> Author: hailfinger
> Date: 2007-12-05 00:15:33 +0100 (Wed, 05 Dec 2007)
> New Revision: 538
>
> Modified:
>    LinuxBIOSv3/lib/lar.c
>    LinuxBIOSv3/util/lar/stream.c
> Log:
> Change wrong "LAR: NO FILE FOUND!" message to "LAR: File not found!".
> The message appears if a file has not been found in the LAR archive and
> is triggered even by lookup routines. Normal capitalization helps
> reducing the frightening effect of the message.
>
> Correct a few typos in other areas of the LAR code as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger 
> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

My first self-acked patch. Flame away!

Carl-Daniel

[LinuxBIOS] r538 - in LinuxBIOSv3: lib util/lar

[Torsten Duwe]

On Wednesday 05 December 2007, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > Change wrong "LAR: NO FILE FOUND!" message to "LAR: File not found!".
>
> My first self-acked patch. Flame away!

Here you go: how is an automated checkin hook to tell the difference between 
this obviously trivial (sic!) change and a printf that might go to an 
autogenerated source file? In the essence: placing more commit hooks is moot, 
when OTOH you _know_ your patch is fine. Thank you for demonstrating my 
point :-)

Torsten