#113: problem

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

AMD CAR questions

#106: flashrom: Add -T to...

coreboot

28 Aug 2008 28 Aug '08

3:47 p.m.

#113: problem ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: anonymous | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: adlo | Version: v2 Keywords: | Dependencies: Patchstatus: there is no patch | ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ there is a bug

-- Ticket URL: http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/ticket/113 coreboot http://www.coreboot.org/

Show replies by date

coreboot

28 Aug 28 Aug

3:48 p.m.

#113: problem --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: adlo | Version: v2 Resolution: | Keywords: Dependencies: | Patchstatus: there is no patch --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment(by anonymous):

omg; why is this not tagged as spam. Here is my bugreport that IS posted as spam:

'flashrom does not support a flash chip named ...', but it does

flashrom gives me the above error which is strange; it says it doesn't support the chip; but it is in the list? I assume this could not be caused by not running `make install`?

{{{ # ./flashrom Calibrating delay loop... OK. No coreboot table found. Found chipset "Intel ICH7M", enabling flash write... OK. Found chip "Macronix MX25L8005" (1024 KB) at physical address 0xfff00000. Found chip "Macronix unknown Macronix SPI chip" (0 KB) at physical address 0xfffff000. Multiple flash chips were detected: MX25L8005 unknown Macronix SPI chip Please specify which chip to use with the -c <chipname> option.

# ./flashrom -f -r -c "Macronix MX25L8005" Calibrating delay loop... OK. No coreboot table found. Found chipset "Intel ICH7M", enabling flash write... OK. No EEPROM/flash device found. Force read (-f -r -c) requested, forcing chip probe success: flashrom does not support a flash chip named 'Macronix MX25L8005'. Run flashrom -L to view the hardware supported in this flashrom version.

# ./flashrom -L|grep 'Macronix MX25L8005' Macronix MX25L8005

}}}

-- Ticket URL: http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/ticket/113#comment:1 coreboot http://www.coreboot.org/

coreboot

3:58 p.m.

Comment(by anonymous):

Try the attached patch.

-- Ticket URL: http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/ticket/113#comment:2 coreboot http://www.coreboot.org/

coreboot

4:07 p.m.

New subject: #113: flashrom -c does not accept vendor+chip name, only chip name (was: problem)

#113: flashrom -c does not accept vendor+chip name, only chip name ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: somebody Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: flashrom | Version: v2 Resolution: | Keywords: Dependencies: | Patchstatus: there is no patch ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Changes (by hailfinger):

* type: defect => enhancement * component: adlo => flashrom

Comment:

Very funny. Your patch breaks flashrom for at least a dozen chips.

The chip vendor is not part of the chip name. Simply use

flashrom -c MX25L8005

One could argue that flashrom -c should accept the combination of vendor and chip name as well, not only the chip name.

-- Ticket URL: http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/ticket/113#comment:3 coreboot http://www.coreboot.org/

coreboot

13 Mar 13 Mar

10:38 a.m.

New subject: #113: flashrom -c does not accept vendor+chip name, only chip name

#113: flashrom -c does not accept vendor+chip name, only chip name ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: anonymous | Owner: somebody Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: flashrom v1.1 Component: flashrom | Version: v2 Keywords: | Dependencies: Patchstatus: there is no patch | ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Changes (by stepan):

* milestone: => flashrom v1.1

-- Ticket URL: http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/ticket/113#comment:4 coreboot http://www.coreboot.org/

coreboot

4 Oct 4 Oct

5:56 p.m.

New subject: #113: flashrom -c does not accept vendor+chip name, only chip name

Comment(by hailfinger):

Is this feature still wanted? If yes, how do we detect whether a user specified chip vendor+name or just chip name?

-- Ticket URL: http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/ticket/113#comment:5 coreboot http://www.coreboot.org/

coreboot

15 Jan 15 Jan

3:27 p.m.

New subject: #113: flashrom -c does not accept vendor+chip name, only chip name

#113: flashrom -c does not accept vendor+chip name, only chip name ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: somebody Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: flashrom v1.1 Component: flashrom | Version: v2 Resolution: invalid | Keywords: Dependencies: | Patchstatus: there is no patch ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Changes (by hailfinger):

* status: new => closed * resolution: => invalid

Comment:

I'm tempted to declare this as a simple case of RTFM. The duplicate detection has been fixed for months, and the rest is just a matter of actually reading the output from flashrom.

-- Ticket URL: http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/ticket/113#comment:6 coreboot http://www.coreboot.org/

5386

days inactive

5891

days old

coreboot@coreboot.org

6 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

coreboot