[LinuxBIOS] superiotool - dump support for IT8661F

[Robinson Tryon]

Signed-off-by: Robinson P. Tryon

Notes:
- Added in the missing tab chars manually (I'm still trying to get
emacs to follow the correct indenting rules).
- Managed to finish up before 1AM, so my proofing should be better
this time... :-)
- What should I do with registers 0x25, 0x26 in the 'Global
Configuration Registers' table?  They both have an LDN of "All-05h",
so should they go with the 0x5 GPIO table or in the GCR table?  (I
took a guess and put them in the former).

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 04.10.2007 20:54, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Robinson P. Tryon

Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
> Notes:
> Added in the missing tab chars manually (I'm still trying to get
>
> emacs to follow the correct indenting rules).
> Managed to finish up before 1AM, so my proofing should be better
>
> this time... :-)
> What should I do with registers 0x25, 0x26 in the 'Global
>
> Configuration Registers' table?  They both have an LDN of "All-05h",
> so should they go with the 0x5 GPIO table or in the GCR table?  (I
> took a guess and put them in the former).

You made the right decision.
> Index: ite.c
>
> --- ite.c	(revision 2823)
> +++ ite.c	(working copy)
> @@ -28,6 +28,39 @@
>
> /* Note: IT8726F has ID 0x8726 (datasheet wrongly says 0x8716). */
>  const static struct superio_registers reg_table[] = {
> {0x8661, "IT8661F", {
> {NOLDN, NULL,
> 	{0x00,0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x20,0x21,
> 	 0x22,0x23,0x24,EOT},
> 	{NANA,NANA,NANA,NANA,NANA,NANA,0x00,NANA,0x86,0x61,
> 	 0x00,0x00,0x00,EOT}},
> {0x0, "Floppy",
> 	{0x30,0x31,0x60,0x61,0x70,0x71,0x74,0xf0,EOT},
> 	{0x00,0x00,0x03,0xf0,0x06,0x02,0x02,0x00,EOT}},
> {0x1, "COM1",
> 	{0x30,0x31,0x60,0x61,0x70,0x71,0xf0,EOT},
> 	{0x00,0x00,0x03,0xf8,0x04,0x02,0x00,EOT}},
> {0x2, "COM2",
> 	{0x30,0x31,0x60,0x61,0x70,0x71,0xf0,EOT},
> 	{0x00,0x00,0x02,0xf8,0x03,0x02,0x00,EOT}},
> {0x3, "Parallel port",
> 	{0x30,0x31,0x60,0x61,0x62,0x63,0x70,0x71,0x74,0xf0,
> 	 EOT},
> 	{0x00,0x00,0x03,0x78,0x07,0x78,0x07,0x02,0x03,0x03,
> 	 EOT}},
> {0x4, "IR",
> 	{0x30,0x31,0x60,0x61,0x62,0x63,0x70,0x71,0x72,0x73,
> 	 0x74,0x75,0xf0,EOT},
> 	{0x00,0x00,0x02,0xe8,0x03,0x00,0x0a,0x02,0x0b,0x02,
> 	 0x01,0x00,0x00,EOT}},
> {0x5, "GPIO",
> 	{0x25,0x26,0x60,0x61,0x62,0x63,0x64,0x65,0x66,0x67,
> 	 0x70,0xf0,0xf1,0xf2,0xf3,0xf4,0xf5,0xf6,0xf7,0xf8,
> 	 0xf9,0xfa,0xfb,0xfc,EOT},
> 	{0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
> 	 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
> 	 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,EOT}},
> {EOT}}},
> {0x8702, "IT8702F", {
> {EOT}}},
> {0x8705, "IT8705F/AF or IT8700F", {

[Uwe Hermann]

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 04.10.2007 20:54, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Robinson P. Tryon
>
> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

Yep, looks good, r2825.

However, this chip will not yet be detected (needs different init
sequence). I'll fix that later if nobody beats me to it.

Uwe.