Frank Vibrans III (efdesign98@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to gerrit, which you can find at http://review.coreboot.org/102
-gerrit
commit 2df301924ace4d1792e60424091ff29745a3f658 Author: Tadas Slotkus devtadas@gmail.com Date: Fri Jul 15 03:41:11 2011 +0300
Libpayload: default DESTDIR for 'make install'
If you would try download FILO via svn, then you probably get error message about libpayload install. This enables manually installing libpayload in legacy style :)
Change-Id: I9f52be939303c5913611f21477d681e11d286382 Signed-off-by: Tadas Slotkus devtadas@gmail.com --- payloads/libpayload/Makefile.inc | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/payloads/libpayload/Makefile.inc b/payloads/libpayload/Makefile.inc index 08f7c9f..03862ca 100644 --- a/payloads/libpayload/Makefile.inc +++ b/payloads/libpayload/Makefile.inc @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ export KERNELVERSION := 0.2.0
ARCHDIR-$(CONFIG_TARGET_I386) := i386 ARCHDIR-$(CONFIG_TARGET_POWERPC) := powerpc +DESTDIR ?= install
real-target: lib
Sven writes: Thom Lauret <diracshore at gmail.com> writes:
Has anyone succeeded installing coreboot onto a Lenovo Thinkpad T61/p ? I see it has been achieved on a T60.
Unfortunaterly that won't work, as we don't have any documentation for the i965 (crestline) Memory Controller used in that Notebook.
Not sure if this is the relevant document, but Intel has on their website the following : Mobile Intel® 965 Express Chipset Family Datasheet Revision 003 June 2007
It's under the name 316273.pdf
In the same vein, I too am very interested in having coreboot on a T61, Sven, in addition to the above, what other documents/resources would be needed to accomplished such a task.
Patrick
Patrick Arnoux wrote:
we don't have any documentation for the i965 (crestline) Memory Controller
Not sure if this is the relevant document,
..
Mobile Intel® 965 Express Chipset Family Datasheet
It isn't. This is only a shallow overview of the chipset. The neccessary documentation requires two levels of NDAs with Intel which in turn requires a solid business case. Further, having access to the right application engineers within Intel during development can easily make the difference of several man-months of forward and reverse engineering, trial and error and guesswork. (Ie. the NDAed docs are also not exhaustive.
//Peter
On 07/16/11 01:55 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Patrick Arnoux wrote:
we don't have any documentation for the i965 (crestline) Memory Controller
Not sure if this is the relevant document,
..
Mobile Intel® 965 Express Chipset Family Datasheet
It isn't. This is only a shallow overview of the chipset. The neccessary documentation requires two levels of NDAs with Intel which in turn requires a solid business case. Further, having access to the right application engineers within Intel during development can easily make the difference of several man-months of forward and reverse engineering, trial and error and guesswork. (Ie. the NDAed docs are also not exhaustive.
//Peter
This "shallow overview" weighs in at over 500 pages. I guess it means we are not in Kansas anymore. These NDAed docs must rival "War and Peace".
As I am still very much interested in the T61, and if you all don't mind, I would like to ask a couple of questions : A) My first thought was to start from the T60, modify whatever needed to be and thank you ma'am Simplistic, yes, but are the T60 and T61 so fundamentally different that this is never going to fly. B) Besides the i965 Controller, what other chips do we need documentation for on the T61 ? C) If I can get to the point where control is handed over to the on disk Boot Block (mind you, this can be USB, DVD, CD, PCMCIA, or Hard disk), do I care anymore about the BIOS. Does an Operating System ;Solaris, Linux, Unix or whatever just goes on about its business and really couldn't give two hoots about whether and what kind of BIOS exists on the machine. D) If there are indeed system calls made to the BIOS, what are they and what are the affected chips. E) What is the minimum level of hardware initialization that needs to be done in order to be able to load an OS. F) Bottom line, I am not interested in an all singing, all dancing BIOS, I just want to load the OS and to paraphrase a quote from Linus T. I just ran into, he just wants the BIOS to load the OS and get the double F out of the way!
I would really appreciate it if people with knowledge of any of the above points would take the time to comment about what they know and I will take it upon myself to summarize.
And if you feel like telling me to go Read The FAQ or the Fine Manual, please, point me in the right direction. It would also be appreciated.
Patrick
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Arnoux parnoux@adelphia.net writes:
On 07/16/11 01:55 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Patrick Arnoux wrote:
we don't have any documentation for the i965 (crestline) Memory Controller
Not sure if this is the relevant document,
..
Mobile Intel® 965 Express Chipset Family Datasheet
It isn't. This is only a shallow overview of the chipset. The neccessary documentation requires two levels of NDAs with Intel which in turn requires a solid business case. Further, having access to the right application engineers within Intel during development can easily make the difference of several man-months of forward and reverse engineering, trial and error and guesswork. (Ie. the NDAed docs are also not exhaustive.
This "shallow overview" weighs in at over 500 pages. I guess it means we are not in Kansas anymore. These NDAed docs must rival "War and Peace".
As I am still very much interested in the T61, and if you all don't mind, I would like to ask a couple of questions : A) My first thought was to start from the T60, modify whatever needed to be and thank you ma'am Simplistic, yes, but are the T60 and T61 so fundamentally different that this is never going to fly.
Well, you have write the code for the i965. As long as you don't get your hands on the real Datasheets and/or the Intel Memory Reference code you have to do a lot of reverse engineering. Reverse engineering would be really hard, and it is most likely not job for one month.
B) Besides the i965 Controller, what other chips do we needdocumentation for on the T61 ?
Everything else should mostly work, and probably only needs some slight adjustments. The Embedded controllers in the T61 are the same as in the T60/X60. The Register space for that probably just differ in a few bits to support stuff that isn't present in the T60.
C) If I can get to the point where control is handed over to theon disk Boot Block (mind you, this can be USB, DVD, CD, PCMCIA, or Hard disk), do I care anymore about the BIOS. Does an Operating System ;Solaris, Linux, Unix or whatever just goes on about its business and really couldn't give two hoots about whether and what kind of BIOS exists on the machine. D) If there are indeed system calls made to the BIOS, what are they and what are the affected chips. E) What is the minimum level of hardware initialization that needs to be done in order to be able to load an OS. F) Bottom line, I am not interested in an all singing, all dancing BIOS, I just want to load the OS and to paraphrase a quote from Linus T. I just ran into, he just wants the BIOS to load the OS and get the double F out of the way!
Especially on a Laptop you want to have a full featured BIOS/ACPI code, because without it you have no Suspend, Power Management and similar stuff. But that's not the problem - Most of the stuff is already working in coreboot.
As mentioned above the challenge is to support the i956 Memory Controller. If someone manages to write the code to support it, everything else is pretty simple.
Cheers,
Sven
-
Frank Vibrans III -
Patrick Arnoux -
Peter Stuge -
Sven Schnelle