[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] buildrom: add packages/kernel/patches/tiny_m57sli

[Ward Vandewege]

These patches are released under the GPLv2, so we can just include them in
our buildrom tree. Do we need a license header for each file?

[ron minnich]

On 9/6/07, Ward Vandewege  wrote:
> These patches are released under the GPLv2, so we can just include them in
> our buildrom tree. Do we need a license header for each file?

This comes from tiny, right? I think since it is a patch we are ok?

Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich

I am glad to see LAB coming back.

ron

[yhlu]

On 9/8/07, ron minnich  wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Ward Vandewege  wrote:
> > These patches are released under the GPLv2, so we can just include them in
> > our buildrom tree. Do we need a license header for each file?
>
> This comes from tiny, right? I think since it is a patch we are ok?

we should put the URL in buildrom to download that quilt patchset from
elinux.org like download linux tar ball...

YH

[ron minnich]

On 9/8/07, yhlu  wrote:
> On 9/8/07, ron minnich  wrote:
> > On 9/6/07, Ward Vandewege  wrote:
> > > These patches are released under the GPLv2, so we can just include them in
> > > our buildrom tree. Do we need a license header for each file?
> >
> > This comes from tiny, right? I think since it is a patch we are ok?
>
> we should put the URL in buildrom to download that quilt patchset from
> elinux.org like download linux tar ball...

good point, ward, is that doable?

ron

[LinuxBIOS] buildrom: add packages/kernel/patches/tiny_m57sli

[Jordan Crouse]

On 08/09/07 11:34 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> On 9/8/07, yhlu  wrote:
> > On 9/8/07, ron minnich  wrote:
> > > On 9/6/07, Ward Vandewege  wrote:
> > > > These patches are released under the GPLv2, so we can just include them in
> > > > our buildrom tree. Do we need a license header for each file?
> > >
> > > This comes from tiny, right? I think since it is a patch we are ok?
> >
> > we should put the URL in buildrom to download that quilt patchset from
> > elinux.org like download linux tar ball...
>
> good point, ward, is that doable?

For OLPC, we wern't using the full linux-tiny set, so thats why we had the
ones we were using local.  If the whole set makes sense, then yeah, this
is a good idea.

Jordan

[Ward Vandewege]

On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 11:34:01AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> On 9/8/07, yhlu  wrote:
> > On 9/8/07, ron minnich  wrote:
> > > On 9/6/07, Ward Vandewege  wrote:
> > > > These patches are released under the GPLv2, so we can just include them in
> > > > our buildrom tree. Do we need a license header for each file?
> > >
> > > This comes from tiny, right? I think since it is a patch we are ok?
> >
> > we should put the URL in buildrom to download that quilt patchset from
> > elinux.org like download linux tar ball...
>
> good point, ward, is that doable?

It is; here are the updated patches, if there are no objections I'm going to
commit later today.

Thanks,
Ward.

[Ward Vandewege]

On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:21:09PM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 11:34:01AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> > On 9/8/07, yhlu  wrote:
> > > On 9/8/07, ron minnich  wrote:
> > > > On 9/6/07, Ward Vandewege  wrote:
> > > > > These patches are released under the GPLv2, so we can just include them in
> > > > > our buildrom tree. Do we need a license header for each file?
> > > >
> > > > This comes from tiny, right? I think since it is a patch we are ok?
> > >
> > > we should put the URL in buildrom to download that quilt patchset from
> > > elinux.org like download linux tar ball...
> >
> > good point, ward, is that doable?
>
> It is; here are the updated patches, if there are no objections I'm going to
> commit later today.

Ron ack'ed this
(http://www.linuxbios.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2007-September/024533.html);
r30.

Thanks,
Ward.