Zheng Bao (zheng.bao@amd.com) just uploaded a new patch set to gerrit, which you can find at http://review.coreboot.org/1265
-gerrit
commit 07f5c00117ba96dbd1688c120af1f7288d178c92 Author: zbao fishbaozi@gmail.com Date: Mon Jul 23 19:52:58 2012 +0800
Remove the misleading 0x100 from the limit.
I dont known if missed something, but why an extra 0x100 was added to limit? My board would get the wrong memory table entry 7f000000-7fffffff as RAM, which is higher than TOM. coreboot memory table: 0. 0000000000000000-0000000000000fff: CONFIGURATION TABLES 1. 0000000000001000-000000000009ffff: RAM 2. 00000000000c0000-000000005e13efff: RAM 3. 000000005e13f000-000000005effffff: CONFIGURATION TABLES 4. 000000005f000000-000000007effffff: RESERVED 5. 000000007f000000-000000007fffffff: RAM 6. 00000000a0000000-00000000afffffff: RESERVED
Change-Id: I3848ed5f23001e5bd61a19833650fe13df26eef3 Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao zheng.bao@amd.com Signed-off-by: zbao fishbaozi@gmail.com --- src/northbridge/amd/agesa/family15tn/northbridge.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/northbridge/amd/agesa/family15tn/northbridge.c b/src/northbridge/amd/agesa/family15tn/northbridge.c index 12aab33..8ad7841 100644 --- a/src/northbridge/amd/agesa/family15tn/northbridge.c +++ b/src/northbridge/amd/agesa/family15tn/northbridge.c @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static void domain_set_resources(device_t dev)
if (!(d.mask & 1)) continue; basek = ((resource_t)(d.base & 0x1fffff00)) << 9; // could overflow, we may lost 6 bit here - limitk = ((resource_t)((d.mask + 0x00000100) & 0x1fffff00)) << 9 ; + limitk = ((resource_t)(d.mask & 0x1fffff00)) << 9 ;
sizek = limitk - basek;