6 Jul
2009
6 Jul
'09
6:08 a.m.
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:36:29AM +0800, Bao, Zheng wrote:
4392 is good. 4395 is not good. I don't exactly which patch causes this problem.
It's probably r4394, I'm seeing issues with that patch too, see http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-July/050486.html
Uwe.