The real problem with Larry's policy is that if you work on any other SCM code free or not you must buy the full version of the tools. That would lock out some of us who have worked on subversion/cvs/etc who want to work on LinuxBIOS.
Before making the jump to bitkeeper a real consideration of the alternitives should be considered.
One that hasn't come up yet is subversion and/or tigris.org.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:53:58PM -0600, ron minnich wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Peter Busser wrote:
The most heard objection against bitkeeper is that it is not free software.
yeah, but that's actually ok by me. It's good software, and Larry's source policy is actually very reasonable.
Plus he has a viable business, which means that they will probably be there in a few years.
Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios