6 Oct
2021
6 Oct
'21
2:29 a.m.
I'm sorry. :(
On 6/10/21 7:47 am, Matt B wrote:
My concern is more about surprise brokenness when trying to use the newest version, if any of those pentiums remain.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com mailto:rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
That's what versions are all about. It seems sensible to me to leave the old bad stuff behind; if people need it, it's all still there if they know the tag. On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:02 PM Matt B <matthewwbradley6@gmail.com <mailto:matthewwbradley6@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I should note I'm not 100% sure what they're doing there. > > Are there any more of these buggy pentiums left in the coreboot tree? (If he chooses to update) I can imagine RMS getting real snippy if we break his thinkpad. :P > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:53 PM ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com <mailto:rminnich@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> nice fine. Might be worth adding the text of this comment (modified as >> needed) to the CL so that in years to come people understand the >> reasons. >> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 12:51 PM Matt B <matthewwbradley6@gmail.com <mailto:matthewwbradley6@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > A quick google turned this up: >> > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.0/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c#253 <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.0/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c#253> >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 4:06 AM Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de <mailto:julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 09:29 +0300, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:12 PM Julian Stecklina >> >> > <julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de <mailto:julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de>> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > But it looks like the workaround was just carried forward with no discussion >> >> > > of >> >> > > whether it's still necessary or what it actually works around. >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > Removal has been suggested with the X2APIC work: >> >> > >> >> > https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55199 <https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55199> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I've been looking at 4.13 instead of master. My bad. In master, indeed most >> >> atomic accesses are gone and the ones writing to ICR are left. This mostly makes >> >> sense and is much clearer now. :) >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Julian >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org <mailto:coreboot@coreboot.org> >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org <mailto:coreboot-leave@coreboot.org> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org <mailto:coreboot@coreboot.org> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org <mailto:coreboot-leave@coreboot.org> > > _______________________________________________ > coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org <mailto:coreboot@coreboot.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org <mailto:coreboot-leave@coreboot.org>
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org