On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:34:04PM -0800, ron minnich wrote:
Note one thing the arrays in the individual files got you. You could drag along ALL types of a (e.g.) the intel southbridge even when you only specified one of them in a dts.
*nods* Hopefully we can be smart about this also in the future.
Now, to get all the seperate constructors, you're going to have to specify that you use all those parts.
Not so elegant. But thinking about it a bit, this comes back to the dts. The dts syntax doesn't have a concept of a composite device, so maybe we should not even try to hack around it?
That's why I did the array, I now recall, but it probably confused everyone, as did this explanation. So never mind.
I agree completely with the concept, just not that implementation. :)
It's possible we should just go back to linker sets :-) ewwww.
Anything linker may turn out to be troublesome?
//Peter