----- "Peter Stuge" peter@stuge.se wrote:
Nasa wrote:
Did you pick a particular CPU for the board, or did the CPU come already installed when you bought the board?
..
I choose the CPU (a number of years ago) which is an Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile 1.66GHz.
Ok. I don't know if this CPU has been tested with coreboot, but even so it is possible that it will just work<tm>. You should give it a go.
I have read a little about payloads and noted that SeaBIOS would be the easiest way to go... However (this being important for the flash chip), I didn't see anything about the benefits of putting a linux kernel as a payload.
Benefits are that fewer steps are required to boot the system, so with the kernel in boot flash you can immediately access the root filesystem regardless of where it is stored.
I did read from the FAQ that most chips aren't large enough to have the kernel added as a payload.
The FAQ needs some updates. I guess "most" chips still aren't large enough for a kernel, but those 16Mbit chips should be able to hold a monolithic kernel optimized for a single board.
If my goal is the fastest boot time possible, while still supporting the basic system, would going to a Linux payload be the way to go?
Maybe, but maybe not. If you are using flash media which does not have a spin-up delay then it might actually be faster for another payload to load the kernel off the drive using DMA.
I am indeed using an SSD drive to boot my system. I also noted that my motherboard isn't supported for full linux kernel install anyways.
If so, what size flash chip should I get?
The larger the better IMO. There can be a chipset limit for the flash chip size, but I don't know what it is for i945 chipsets. In any case a larger flash chip will still be usable, just at e.g. half capacity.
BTW: once I get this working, it's going up on the carpc forum -- I know a lot of people would be interested in reducing their systems boot time.
Yes. It's also the first thing I used coreboot for myself. Please mention that it is very important for people to check if their mainboard and/or CPU+chipset is already supported, otherwise they are looking at rather large projects of studying PC architecture and developing lots of low-level code to implement that support. An unsupported mainboard with a supported CPU+chipset is much less effort though, and could best case be just a few days-few weeks project for a C programmer.
For new installs of course hardware known to be coreboot confirmed would be best. :)
Will Do.
Nasa