On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:33:29AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
So call it what it is - a useful option to LAR to cut out the objcopy middleman. Which is fine. I'm happy with that.
It's even a bit better since the objcopy would destroy the entry point.
Also, I would abandon the use of .o naming in the LAR - that will drive others (like me) off course thinking an object file is living in the LAR, which is not the case.
The "object file" is now a subdirectory in the lar - blah.o/segment0
Perhaps too subtle in a new archive format? I think it's OK as long as we have good docs for lar explaining why we've created it and how it is supposed to work.
//Peter