j
k
j a
j l
Pattrick Hueper wrote:
...... my_wrl(0x10 * 4, 0xf000f065); my_wrb(0x000ff065, 0xcf); Has this gotten some feedback? The fix is correct! This code is currently in svn, isnt it?
... my_wrl(0x10 * 4, 0xf000f065); my_wrb(0x000ff065, 0xcf); Has this gotten some feedback? The fix is correct!
my_wrl(0x10 * 4, 0xf000f065); my_wrb(0x000ff065, 0xcf);
my_wrl(0x10 * 4, 0xf000f065);
my_wrb(0x000ff065, 0xcf);
Has this gotten some feedback? The fix is correct!
This code is currently in svn, isnt it?
Yes - I was looking at an older patch. Thanks!
//Peter
Back to the thread
Back to the list