Re: [coreboot] seabios failure with v2 and -fomit-frame-pointer

[ron minnich]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Kevin O'Connor  wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:01:41PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> > are the payloads built with omit frame pointer?
> >
> > it's not a good thing if we have to sync how payloads are built with
> > how coreboot is built.
>
> SeaBIOS does use -fomit-frame-pointer (enabling it provides noticably
> better code generation).  However, I don't think this is related to
> the payload at all.  The frame-pointer option controls what gcc puts
> into %ebp, and SeaBIOS doesn't care at all what's in that register
> when it is launched.

yes, we may still be looking at a symptom of a different problem

ron