Author: oxygene Date: 2009-04-03 14:52:43 +0200 (Fri, 03 Apr 2009) New Revision: 4049
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/arch/i386/Config.lb trunk/coreboot-v2/src/boot/hardwaremain.c trunk/coreboot-v2/util/newconfig/config.g Log: the attached patch is the last infrastructure change necessary for romfs. Everything else to make a target romfs aware happens in the targets.
What the patch does: 1. missing romfs.h include 2. special handling while creating coreboot.rom While the romfs code path in the makefile doesn't actually use the file, it's possible that the build of coreboot.rom fails in a romfs setup, because the individual buildrom image is too small to host both coreboot and payloads (as the payloads aren't supposed to be there). Thus, a special case to replace the payload with /dev/null in case of a romfs build. There would be cleaner ways, but they're not easily encoded in the Config.lb format. 3. config.g is changed to create rules for a romfs build
Targets should still build (they do for me)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi patrick.georgi@coresystems.de Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/arch/i386/Config.lb =================================================================== --- trunk/coreboot-v2/src/arch/i386/Config.lb 2009-04-03 02:18:23 UTC (rev 4048) +++ trunk/coreboot-v2/src/arch/i386/Config.lb 2009-04-03 12:52:43 UTC (rev 4049) @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ end else makerule coreboot.rom - depends "coreboot.strip buildrom $(PAYLOAD-1)" - action "./buildrom $< $@ $(PAYLOAD-1) $(ROM_IMAGE_SIZE) $(ROM_SECTION_SIZE)" + depends "coreboot.strip buildrom $(PAYLOAD-1)" + action "PAYLOAD=$(PAYLOAD-1); if [ $(CONFIG_ROMFS) -eq 1 ]; then PAYLOAD=/dev/null; fi; ./buildrom $< $@ $$PAYLOAD $(ROM_IMAGE_SIZE) $(ROM_SECTION_SIZE)" end end
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/boot/hardwaremain.c =================================================================== --- trunk/coreboot-v2/src/boot/hardwaremain.c 2009-04-03 02:18:23 UTC (rev 4048) +++ trunk/coreboot-v2/src/boot/hardwaremain.c 2009-04-03 12:52:43 UTC (rev 4049) @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #include <part/hard_reset.h> #include <part/init_timer.h> #include <boot/elf.h> +#include <romfs.h>
/** * @brief Main function of the DRAM part of coreboot.
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/util/newconfig/config.g =================================================================== --- trunk/coreboot-v2/util/newconfig/config.g 2009-04-03 02:18:23 UTC (rev 4048) +++ trunk/coreboot-v2/util/newconfig/config.g 2009-04-03 12:52:43 UTC (rev 4049) @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ global_exported_options = [] romimages = {} buildroms = [] +rommapping = {} curimage = 0 +bootblocksize = 0 alloptions = 0 # override uses at top level
local_path = re.compile(r'^.') @@ -277,8 +279,11 @@ self.arch = arch
def setpayload(self, payload): + global rommapping self.payload = payload
+ rommapping[self.name] = payload + def setinitfile(self, initfile): self.initfile = initfile
@@ -1351,7 +1356,10 @@
def endromimage(): global curimage + global bootblocksize mainboard() + imagesize = getoption("ROM_IMAGE_SIZE", curimage) + bootblocksize += imagesize print "End ROMIMAGE" curimage = 0 #curpart = 0 @@ -2209,16 +2217,22 @@
# def writemakefile(path): + global rommapping + global bootblocksize makefilepath = os.path.join(path, "Makefile") print "Creating", makefilepath file = safe_open(makefilepath, 'w+') writemakefileheader(file, makefilepath)
# main rule - file.write("\nall:") + file.write("\nall: romtool") for i in buildroms: - file.write(" %s" % i.name) + file.write(" %sfs" % i.name) file.write("\n\n") + + # romtool rules + file.write("\nromtool:\n\tcd $(TOP)/util/romtool; make\n") + file.write("include Makefile.settings\n\n") for i, o in romimages.items(): file.write("%s/coreboot.rom:\n" % o.getname()) @@ -2245,9 +2259,26 @@ for j in i.roms: file.write(" %s/coreboot.rom " % j) file.write("> %s\n\n" %i.name) + # build the bootblock here as well. + file.write("\n") + file.write("\t cat ") + for j in i.roms: + file.write(" %s/coreboot.strip " % j) + file.write("> %s.bootblock\n\n" %i.name)
+ romsize = getoption("ROM_SIZE", image) + # i.name? That can not be right, can it? + file.write("%sfs: %s $(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool\n" %(i.name,i.name)); + file.write("\trm -f coreboot.romfs\n"); + file.write("\t$(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool %sfs create %s %s %s.bootblock\n" % (i.name, romsize, bootblocksize, i.name)) + for i in buildroms: + for j in i.roms: + #failover is a hack that will go away soon. + if (j != "failover") and (rommapping[j] != "/dev/null"): + file.write("\t $(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool %sfs add-payload %s %s/payload\n" % (i.name, rommapping[j], j)) + file.write("\t $(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool %sfs print\n" % i.name)
- file.write(".PHONY: all clean") + file.write(".PHONY: all clean romtool") for i in romimages.keys(): file.write(" %s-clean" % i) for i, o in romimages.items():