ron minnich wrote:
I realize there was a lot of hope in the early days that RISC-V implied "openness" but as we can see that is not so.
I hope that noone had that impression.
The key point (which I have to repeat every now and then) is that RISC-V *supports* openness, in ways not possible with x86, ARM or -yes- even POWER, at least at the moment.
An open implementation of RISC-V will require a commitment on the part of a company to opening it up at all levels, not just the instruction set.
ron minnich wrote:
I'm still interested in risc-v, just not hifive.
Right - I think it's important not to judge an open architecture by any one implementation, but to remember (as you point out) the difference between architecture and implementation.
//Peter