On 28.09.2007 15:33, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:19:57AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
OK, I like signed offset, but let's let stefan weigh in. It's critical that we get this right.
I don't have any particular opinion here, but I'll NACK the patch in this form. If everybody else agrees with the patch _and_ there are at least 3-4 lines of code comments which explain all the issues involved here, the drawbacks and advantages of this (and the alternative) solution(s) etc., I'll be happy to ACK :) As already stated, this is way too tricky and non-obvious to go in without a good code comment.
I'll add a detailed writeup and remove incorrect comments so that the comments match the code again.
Carl-Daniel