13 Nov
2005
13 Nov
'05
2:30 p.m.
* Eric W. Biederman ebiederman@lnxi.com [051113 09:43]:
I actually a little surprised you don't remember as I think you were the one who brought it to the list. Someone was using the old definition which was uint64_t in a 64bit environment and they couldn't read the table.
Seems I was oblivious yesterday. You are right. Therefore I have attached a patch to clean up lb_uint64 handling and comment it.
Looks Ok?
Stefan