On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 16:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Ronald G. Minnich" rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
Since it appears nobody is maintaining FILO do you think we should put it in util directory in freebios2?
that's my plan.
Please let's give it's own namespace, just like freebios2 has. Or at least could we start a util tree for these kinds of things.
I'd like to keep the parts that are independent of the LinuxBIOS revision a little separate so if we ever need to do something like the freebios2 tree again they can happily live again.
Romcc and config.g and one or two other utilities are tightly tied to the LinuxBIOS revisions so the make a lot of sense.
I think we should move most of the utils into its own util package. The config tool should be move to a new directory call "tools" in freebios2.
Ollie