On Nov 27, 2007 1:33 AM, Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de wrote:
I can't believe this is the workaround for not being able to put a "jmp _entry" in front of the code.
It might be becoming just another "how do we explain _that_ to people now?" just like the v2 device tree.
my 2ct
I think it is ok. What we are doing is moving to a completely uniform way of handling files. They are always ELF, we always process them and produce LAR files. The special case for binary blobs is gone -- I think this is good. We actually use the LAR entry in all cases, since we got rid of binary blobs.
ron