On 15.04.2009 23:41 Uhr, Peter Stuge wrote:
Can someone comment on whether it's simply safe to change that to a fixed coreboot.cbfs filename?
I think we should just make it output coreboot.rom and forget the fs extension. There's no reason to confuse people with two output files based on a config option.
I think there is, if the file format changes. If the contents is always the same type I agree it's better to have only one name.
The content is always the same type.. it's a coreboot image.