21 Aug
2007
21 Aug
'07
2:44 a.m.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:29:16PM +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote:
- *(u32*)(0x400)=TTYSx_BASE;
It's actually an u16 per port.
I don't like where this is going.
I don't want LB to be BIOS-compatible, I think that would be a regression.
What happened with the lbtable and the device tree?
//Peter