Re: [coreboot] [PATCH]More consistent behaviour for printk_*

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 27.04.2009 21:32, Corey Osgood wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ron minnich  wrote:
> > I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.
>
> If we're going to keep spending time making v2 more v3-like (printk, CBFS,
> Kconfig, etc), then why even bother with v3? v3 seems like it's got some
> really great advantages, but noone seems to care about finishing it.

I still hope we can whip v2 in shape well enough that major parts can be
transplanted into v3.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel